Front vs Capacity

A detailed comparison of Front and Capacity. Find out which AI Support solution is right for your team.

📌Key Takeaways

1Front vs Capacity: Comparing 6 criteria.
2Front wins 6 categories, Capacity wins 0, with 0 ties.
3Front: 4.0/5 rating. Capacity: 4.4/5 rating.
4Overall recommendation: Front edges ahead in this comparison.

Option A

Front

★4.0

Customer communication platform combining email, chat, and social with AI-powered features for team collaboration

6 wins

View full review →

Option B

Capacity

★4.4

AI-powered support automation platform that connects to your apps and learns from your content to answer questions

0 wins

View full review →

Front wins

Ties

Capacity wins

Feature Comparison

Criteria	Front	Capacity	Winner
Response Accuracy	5	4	Front
Multi-language	4	3	Front
Handoff Quality	5	4	Front
Self-service	5	4	Front
Analytics	4	3	Front
Integration Depth	4	3	Front

Detailed Analysis

Response Accuracy

Front

Front's response accuracy capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's response accuracy capabilities

Comparing response accuracy between Front and Capacity.

Multi-language

Front

Front's multi-language capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's multi-language capabilities

Comparing multi-language between Front and Capacity.

Handoff Quality

Front

Front's handoff quality capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's handoff quality capabilities

Comparing handoff quality between Front and Capacity.

Self-service

Front

Front's self-service capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's self-service capabilities

Comparing self-service between Front and Capacity.

Analytics

Front

Front's analytics capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's analytics capabilities

Comparing analytics between Front and Capacity.

Integration Depth

Front

Front's integration depth capabilities

Capacity

Capacity's integration depth capabilities

Comparing integration depth between Front and Capacity.

Feature-by-Feature Breakdown

Unified Omnichannel Inbox

Front

Front's unified inbox consolidates all customer communications—including email, live chat, SMS, WhatsApp, social media messages from Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, plus voice transcriptions—into a single, streamlined interface. This eliminates the need for agents to switch between multiple applications and ensures no customer message falls through the cracks. Each conversation thread maintains complete context regardless of which channel the customer uses, enabling seamless handoffs between channels without losing history. The inbox supports custom views, filters, and tags that let teams organize conversations by priority, topic, customer segment, or any custom criteria, making it easy to focus on what matters most. Agents can manage all customer interactions from one place, reducing context-switching by 60% and ensuring consistent, informed responses across every channel.

✓ Agents can manage all customer interactions from one place, reducing context-switching by 60% and ensuring consistent, informed responses across every channel

Capacity

AI knowledge base

✓ AI knowledge base

Both Front and Capacity offer Unified Omnichannel Inbox. Front's approach focuses on front's unified inbox consolidates all customer communications—including email, live chat, sms, whatsapp, social media messages from facebook, twitter, and instagram, plus voice transcriptions—into a single, streamlined interface., while Capacity emphasizes AI knowledge base. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.

AI-Powered Response Suggestions

Front

Front's artificial intelligence continuously analyzes your team's historical conversations, successful resolution patterns, and communication styles to generate intelligent response suggestions in real-time. When an agent opens a conversation, the AI evaluates the customer's message, identifies intent and sentiment, and presents draft responses that match your brand voice and address the specific issue at hand. The system learns from which suggestions agents accept, modify, or reject, continuously refining its recommendations to become more accurate over time. Agents can accept suggestions with one click, edit them as needed, or use them as starting points for more complex responses. Reduces average response time by up to 40% while maintaining personalization and ensuring consistent messaging across all team members.

✓ Reduces average response time by up to 40% while maintaining personalization and ensuring consistent messaging across all team members

Capacity

Chatbot and live chat

✓ Chatbot and live chat

Both Front and Capacity offer AI-Powered Response Suggestions. Front's approach focuses on front's artificial intelligence continuously analyzes your team's historical conversations, successful resolution patterns, and communication styles to generate intelligent response suggestions in real-time., while Capacity emphasizes Chatbot and live chat. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.

Collaborative Team Workflows

Front

Front transforms customer communication from an individual activity into a collaborative team effort through features like internal comments, shared drafts, @mentions, and real-time collision detection. Team members can discuss customer issues privately within conversation threads without the customer seeing these internal exchanges, enabling knowledge sharing and coordinated responses. Shared drafts allow agents to prepare responses and have them reviewed by supervisors or subject matter experts before sending. The collision detection feature prevents multiple agents from responding to the same message simultaneously, eliminating duplicate responses and customer confusion. Enables seamless team coordination on complex customer issues while maintaining a single, coherent voice to the customer.

✓ Enables seamless team coordination on complex customer issues while maintaining a single, coherent voice to the customer

Capacity

App integrations

✓ App integrations

Both Front and Capacity offer Collaborative Team Workflows. Front's approach focuses on front transforms customer communication from an individual activity into a collaborative team effort through features like internal comments, shared drafts, @mentions, and real-time collision detection., while Capacity emphasizes App integrations. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.

Intelligent Conversation Routing

Front

Front's rules engine and AI-powered routing automatically direct incoming conversations to the most appropriate team members based on customizable criteria including message content, customer attributes, conversation history, agent skills, and current workload. The system can analyze message sentiment and urgency to prioritize critical issues, route VIP customers to dedicated account managers, or distribute conversations evenly across available agents. Advanced routing rules can incorporate data from integrated CRM systems to ensure customers always reach agents familiar with their account history and specific needs. Ensures customers reach the right expert immediately, reducing escalations by 35% and improving first-contact resolution rates.

✓ Ensures customers reach the right expert immediately, reducing escalations by 35% and improving first-contact resolution rates

Capacity

Workflow automation

✓ Workflow automation

Both Front and Capacity offer Intelligent Conversation Routing. Front's approach focuses on front's rules engine and ai-powered routing automatically direct incoming conversations to the most appropriate team members based on customizable criteria including message content, customer attributes, conversation history, agent skills, and current workload., while Capacity emphasizes Workflow automation. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.

Analytics and Performance Insights

Front

Front provides comprehensive analytics dashboards that give managers real-time visibility into team performance, customer satisfaction trends, and operational efficiency metrics. Track key indicators including response times, resolution rates, conversation volumes, individual agent performance, and customer satisfaction scores across all channels. The platform offers customizable reports that can be scheduled for automatic delivery, enabling data-driven decisions about staffing, training needs, and process improvements. Historical trend analysis helps identify patterns in customer inquiries, peak volume periods, and emerging issues before they become widespread problems. Empowers managers to optimize team performance with actionable insights, identifying coaching opportunities and process improvements that drive measurable results.

✓ Empowers managers to optimize team performance with actionable insights, identifying coaching opportunities and process improvements that drive measurable results

Capacity

Analytics

✓ Analytics

Both Front and Capacity offer Analytics and Performance Insights. Front's approach focuses on front provides comprehensive analytics dashboards that give managers real-time visibility into team performance, customer satisfaction trends, and operational efficiency metrics., while Capacity emphasizes Analytics. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.

Strengths & Weaknesses

Front

Strengths

✓Unified Omnichannel Inbox: Front's unified inbox consolidates all customer communications—including email, live chat, SMS, WhatsApp, social media messages from Facebook, Twitter...
✓AI-Powered Response Suggestions: Front's artificial intelligence continuously analyzes your team's historical conversations, successful resolution patterns, and communication styles t...
✓Collaborative Team Workflows: Front transforms customer communication from an individual activity into a collaborative team effort through features like internal comments, shared d...
✓Intelligent Conversation Routing: Front's rules engine and AI-powered routing automatically direct incoming conversations to the most appropriate team members based on customizable cri...
✓Analytics and Performance Insights: Front provides comprehensive analytics dashboards that give managers real-time visibility into team performance, customer satisfaction trends, and ope...

Weaknesses

✗AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
✗Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
✗Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.

Capacity

Strengths

✓enables support teams to dramatically reduce ticket volume while simultaneously improving resolution times and customer satisfaction scores.
✓enable continuous optimization, helping support leaders measure automation ROI and identify opportunities for improvement.
✓reduce ticket volume while simultaneously improving resolution times and customer satisfaction scores.

Weaknesses

✗Less sophisticated than enterprise tools
✗Requires content investment
✗Smaller company

Use Case Fit

AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting

Front

Approach: Front automates the entire outbound prospecting workflow using AI. The platform identifies ideal customer profiles, enriches contact data from multiple sources, and generates personalized email sequences at scale. Sales teams can set targeting criteria and let the AI handle research, outreach, and follow-ups.

Outcome: 70% time savings on prospecting activities, 3x increase in qualified meetings booked, 50% improvement in email response rates through AI personalization.

Capacity

Approach: Capacity automates the entire outbound prospecting workflow using AI. The platform identifies ideal customer profiles, enriches contact data from multiple sources, and generates personalized email sequences at scale. Sales teams can set targeting criteria and let the AI handle research, outreach, and follow-ups.

Outcome: 70% time savings on prospecting activities, 3x increase in qualified meetings booked, 50% improvement in email response rates through AI personalization.

Recommendation: Both Front and Capacity support this use case effectively. Compare their approaches and choose based on which aligns better with your existing processes.

Lead Qualification and Scoring

Front

Approach: Front uses AI to automatically qualify and score leads based on firmographic data, behavioral signals, and engagement patterns. The system continuously learns from conversion data to improve scoring accuracy and prioritize the highest-value opportunities.

Outcome: 45% increase in lead-to-opportunity conversion, 60% reduction in time spent on unqualified leads, 2x improvement in sales team productivity.

Capacity

Approach: Capacity uses AI to automatically qualify and score leads based on firmographic data, behavioral signals, and engagement patterns. The system continuously learns from conversion data to improve scoring accuracy and prioritize the highest-value opportunities.

Outcome: 45% increase in lead-to-opportunity conversion, 60% reduction in time spent on unqualified leads, 2x improvement in sales team productivity.

Recommendation: Both Front and Capacity support this use case effectively. Compare their approaches and choose based on which aligns better with your existing processes.

Industry-Specific Fit

Industry	Front	Capacity	Better Fit
SaaS & Technology	Front is exceptionally well-suited for SaaS and technology companies that need to provide responsive, knowledgeable support to users who expect quick resolutions. The platform's ability to integrate with product databases, pull subscription information, and surface technical documentation helps support teams resolve complex software issues efficiently. Technology companies particularly benefit from Front's collaboration features, which enable support agents to quickly loop in engineering or product team members when technical expertise is needed.	Not specified	Front
E-commerce & Retail	E-commerce businesses leverage Front to manage high volumes of customer inquiries across multiple channels including email, social media, and live chat. The platform's integration with e-commerce platforms like Shopify enables agents to view order status, shipping information, and purchase history directly within conversations. During peak seasons like holidays, Front's automation and AI features help teams handle volume spikes without sacrificing response quality or customer satisfaction.	Not specified	Front
Financial Services	Financial services firms use Front to deliver the high-touch, personalized service their clients expect while maintaining compliance and security standards. The platform's audit trails, permission controls, and data handling capabilities meet the stringent requirements of regulated industries. Wealth management firms and banks particularly value Front's ability to maintain complete conversation history and client context across all interactions.	Not specified	Front
Logistics & Transportation	Logistics companies rely on Front to coordinate communications across complex supply chains involving multiple stakeholders including shippers, carriers, and recipients. The platform's ability to consolidate communications from various channels and maintain context across long-running shipment conversations helps logistics teams provide proactive updates and quickly resolve issues that arise during transit.	Not specified	Front
Professional Services	Consulting firms, agencies, and professional services organizations use Front to manage client communications while maintaining the personal relationships that drive their business. The platform enables teams to collaborate on client responses, ensuring consistent quality and leveraging collective expertise. The ability to assign conversations to specific account managers while maintaining team visibility supports both accountability and knowledge sharing.	Not specified	Front
Healthcare	Healthcare organizations leverage Front to manage patient communications across scheduling, billing, and care coordination while maintaining HIPAA compliance. The platform's security features and access controls ensure sensitive patient information is protected, while automation capabilities help healthcare teams handle high inquiry volumes efficiently without compromising the personal touch patients expect.	Not specified	Front
Real Estate	Real estate agencies and property management companies use Front to manage communications with buyers, sellers, tenants, and property owners across multiple properties and transactions. The platform's ability to maintain complete conversation history and integrate with property management systems helps agents provide informed, contextual responses that build trust and close deals faster.	Not specified	Front
Education	Educational institutions leverage Front to manage communications with students, parents, and faculty across admissions, enrollment, financial aid, and student services. The platform's collaboration features enable different departments to work together on complex student inquiries, while automation helps handle the volume spikes that occur during enrollment periods and academic deadlines.	Not specified	Front

Our Verdict

Front and Capacity are both strong AI Support solutions. Front excels at unified omnichannel inbox. Both support key use cases like ai sdr: automated outbound prospecting, but with different approaches. Choose based on which specific features and approach best fit your workflow and requirements.

Choose Front if you:

✓You need unified omnichannel inbox capabilities
✓You need ai-powered response suggestions capabilities
✓You operate in SaaS & Technology
✓AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting is your primary use case

View Front

Choose Capacity if you:

✓AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting is your primary use case
✓You prefer Capacity's approach to ai support
✓You prefer Capacity's approach to ai support

View Capacity

Need Help Choosing?

Get expert guidance on selecting between Front and Capacity for your specific use case.

Find a Strategy Partner

Frequently Asked Questions

It depends on your specific needs. Front and Capacity each have strengths in different areas. Compare features, integrations, and pricing to determine which is best for your use case.

In some cases, yes. Many teams use complementary tools together. Check if both platforms offer integrations or APIs that allow them to work together.

Both platforms offer different onboarding experiences. Front and Capacity each have their own setup processes. Most users can get started with either within a few hours.

The main differences are in their approach, feature set, and target use cases. Review the comparison criteria above to see detailed breakdowns of how they differ.

For small teams, consider factors like ease of use, pricing tiers, and the specific features you need most. Both Front and Capacity can work for small teams depending on your priorities.

Sources & Evidence

AI-powered response suggestions and message drafting that learns from team communication patterns
Source: Front's AI engine analyzes historical conversations and team communication styles to generate contextually relevant response suggestions, reducing response time by up to 40% and ensuring brand consistency across all agents. Unlike basic ticketing systems that simply organize messages, Front's AI provides intelligent assistance by understanding context, sentiment, and intent—learning from thousands of previous interactions to suggest responses that match your team's voice and address customer needs accurately. This machine learning approach means the system continuously improves, becoming more accurate and helpful as your team uses it.
AI-powered ticket automation with human-in-the-loop oversight that automatically resolves support tickets without manual intervention while maintaining quality control
Source: Capacity's core differentiator is its ability to autonomously handle entire support workflows—from initial ticket receipt through resolution—while maintaining human control through intelligent routing, confidence-based escalation, and continuous quality monitoring. Unlike basic chatbots that simply deflect inquiries, Capacity's AI actually resolves issues by accessing knowledge bases, executing workflows, and providing substantive answers. The human-in-the-loop architecture ensures complex issues reach appropriate specialists while AI handles routine inquiries, enabling support teams to focus on high-value interactions while achieving up to 70% automation rates on routine tickets.