Consensus vs Elicit
A detailed comparison of Consensus and Elicit. Find out which AI Research solution is right for your team.
📌Key Takeaways
- 1Consensus vs Elicit: Comparing 6 criteria.
- 2Consensus wins 2 categories, Elicit wins 4, with 0 ties.
- 3Consensus: 4.2/5 rating. Elicit: 4.0/5 rating.
- 4Overall recommendation: Elicit edges ahead in this comparison.
Consensus
AI-powered academic search engine that finds and synthesizes answers from 200M+ peer-reviewed papers with Consensus Meter
Elicit
AI research assistant for systematic reviews with paper search, data extraction, and synthesis across 125M+ papers
2
Consensus wins
0
Ties
4
Elicit wins
Feature Comparison
| Criteria | Consensus | Elicit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 4 | 5 | Elicit |
| Source Quality | 4 | 5 | Elicit |
| Citation | 5 | 3 | Consensus |
| Depth of Analysis | 3 | 4 | Elicit |
| Real-time Data | 5 | 3 | Consensus |
| Ease of Use | 3 | 4 | Elicit |
Detailed Analysis
Accuracy
ElicitConsensus
Consensus's accuracy capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's accuracy capabilities
Comparing accuracy between Consensus and Elicit.
Source Quality
ElicitConsensus
Consensus's source quality capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's source quality capabilities
Comparing source quality between Consensus and Elicit.
Citation
ConsensusConsensus
Consensus's citation capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's citation capabilities
Comparing citation between Consensus and Elicit.
Depth of Analysis
ElicitConsensus
Consensus's depth of analysis capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's depth of analysis capabilities
Comparing depth of analysis between Consensus and Elicit.
Real-time Data
ConsensusConsensus
Consensus's real-time data capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's real-time data capabilities
Comparing real-time data between Consensus and Elicit.
Ease of Use
ElicitConsensus
Consensus's ease of use capabilities
Elicit
Elicit's ease of use capabilities
Comparing ease of use between Consensus and Elicit.
Feature-by-Feature Breakdown
Consensus Search
ConsensusConsensus
Consensus Search revolutionizes academic research by enabling users to ask natural language questions and receive synthesized, evidence-based answers drawn from millions of peer-reviewed papers. The AI-powered search engine goes far beyond traditional keyword matching—it understands research context, interprets scientific methodology, and identifies relevant findings even when papers use different terminology. When a user asks a question like 'Does meditation reduce anxiety?', the system analyzes hundreds of relevant studies, extracts their conclusions, and presents a coherent synthesis showing what the collective research indicates. Each answer includes the Consensus Meter visualization showing agreement levels, plus direct links to source papers for verification. The search also highlights key findings from individual studies, showing sample sizes, methodologies, and statistical significance to help users evaluate evidence quality. Transform hours of manual literature review into seconds of AI-powered research synthesis with fully cited, verifiable answers
✓ Transform hours of manual literature review into seconds of AI-powered research synthesis with fully cited, verifiable answers
Elicit
Elicit's semantic search capability goes beyond keyword matching to understand the conceptual meaning behind research questions. When users enter a query like 'What interventions reduce anxiety in college students?', the system interprets the underlying research intent and searches across millions of academic papers to find semantically relevant results—even if papers don't contain the exact search terms. The AI understands synonyms, related concepts, and contextual relationships, surfacing papers that traditional keyword searches would miss. Results are ranked by relevance to the specific research question rather than just citation count or recency. Researchers discover more relevant papers faster, including studies they would have missed with traditional keyword-based searches.
✓ Researchers discover more relevant papers faster, including studies they would have missed with traditional keyword-based searches
Both Consensus and Elicit offer Consensus Search. Consensus's approach focuses on consensus search revolutionizes academic research by enabling users to ask natural language questions and receive synthesized, evidence-based answers drawn from millions of peer-reviewed papers., while Elicit emphasizes elicit's semantic search capability goes beyond keyword matching to understand the conceptual meaning behind research questions.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Study Insights & Summaries
ConsensusConsensus
Study Insights provides AI-generated summaries of research papers that extract and highlight the most critical information without requiring users to read entire publications. The machine learning models are trained to identify paper structure and extract key elements including research questions, methodology, sample characteristics, primary findings, statistical results, and author conclusions. Each summary is structured consistently, making it easy to quickly compare findings across multiple papers. The system also identifies and highlights limitations acknowledged by researchers, potential conflicts of interest, and funding sources—critical context often buried in paper text. For quantitative studies, key metrics and statistical significance values are prominently displayed, helping users quickly assess the strength of findings. Understand the essential findings, methodology, and limitations of any research paper in minutes rather than hours
✓ Understand the essential findings, methodology, and limitations of any research paper in minutes rather than hours
Elicit
Elicit's data extraction engine automatically reads through research papers and pulls out structured information based on user-defined columns. Researchers can specify what data points they need—such as sample size, study duration, intervention type, primary outcomes, effect sizes, or limitations—and Elicit will extract this information from each paper in a systematic, tabular format. The system handles variations in how information is presented across different papers and journals, normalizing extracted data for easy comparison. Users can export extracted data to spreadsheets for further analysis or meta-analysis calculations. Transforms weeks of manual data extraction work into hours, enabling more comprehensive systematic reviews with larger paper sets.
✓ Transforms weeks of manual data extraction work into hours, enabling more comprehensive systematic reviews with larger paper sets
Both Consensus and Elicit offer Study Insights & Summaries. Consensus's approach focuses on study insights provides ai-generated summaries of research papers that extract and highlight the most critical information without requiring users to read entire publications., while Elicit emphasizes elicit's data extraction engine automatically reads through research papers and pulls out structured information based on user-defined columns.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Consensus Meter
ConsensusConsensus
The Consensus Meter is Consensus's signature feature that visually represents the level of scientific agreement on any research question. When users search for a topic, the meter displays the percentage of studies that support, oppose, or show mixed results on the question at hand. This visualization transforms the abstract concept of 'scientific consensus' into an immediately understandable graphic. The meter is powered by AI that reads and classifies findings from relevant papers, categorizing each study's conclusions and aggregating them into an overall consensus view. Users can click through to see which specific papers support each position, enabling deeper investigation of why certain studies reached different conclusions. This feature is particularly valuable for contested topics where understanding the weight of evidence—not just individual studies—is crucial. Instantly understand whether scientific research supports, opposes, or is divided on any topic without manually reviewing dozens of papers
✓ Instantly understand whether scientific research supports, opposes, or is divided on any topic without manually reviewing dozens of papers
Elicit
Beyond individual paper analysis, Elicit synthesizes findings across multiple papers to identify patterns, consensus views, and contradictions in the literature. The platform can generate summaries that aggregate key findings from dozens of papers, highlighting where studies agree, where they diverge, and what gaps exist in current research. This synthesis capability helps researchers quickly understand the state of knowledge on a topic without reading every paper in detail. The AI identifies methodological trends, common limitations, and emerging research directions across the literature. Enables researchers to rapidly develop comprehensive understanding of research landscapes and identify opportunities for novel contributions.
✓ Enables researchers to rapidly develop comprehensive understanding of research landscapes and identify opportunities for novel contributions
Both Consensus and Elicit offer Consensus Meter. Consensus's approach focuses on consensus meter is consensus's signature feature that visually represents the level of scientific agreement on any research question., while Elicit emphasizes beyond individual paper analysis, elicit synthesizes findings across multiple papers to identify patterns, consensus views, and contradictions in the literature.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Citation Network & Research Lineage
ConsensusConsensus
The Citation Network feature maps the intellectual lineage of research by visualizing how papers cite and build upon each other over time. Users can explore interactive network graphs showing foundational papers that established key concepts, subsequent studies that replicated or extended findings, and recent developments pushing the field forward. The visualization identifies highly-cited influential papers, research clusters working on related questions, and the evolution of ideas across decades of scholarship. This feature helps researchers understand not just what is known, but how knowledge developed—which early studies were seminal, which findings have been consistently replicated, and which represent emerging areas of investigation. The network also reveals connections between seemingly disparate research areas, enabling interdisciplinary discovery. Trace the evolution of scientific ideas and identify the most influential foundational research in any field
✓ Trace the evolution of scientific ideas and identify the most influential foundational research in any field
Elicit
Elicit maintains rigorous academic standards by providing transparent citations and direct links to source documents for all extracted information. Every data point, quote, or finding extracted by the AI includes a citation to the specific paper and often the specific section where the information was found. Users can click through to verify any extracted information against the original source, ensuring accuracy and enabling proper academic citation. The platform also flags when information is uncertain or when papers contain conflicting claims. Maintains academic integrity and enables researchers to confidently cite findings while quickly verifying AI-extracted information.
✓ Maintains academic integrity and enables researchers to confidently cite findings while quickly verifying AI-extracted information
Both Consensus and Elicit offer Citation Network & Research Lineage. Consensus's approach focuses on citation network feature maps the intellectual lineage of research by visualizing how papers cite and build upon each other over time., while Elicit emphasizes elicit maintains rigorous academic standards by providing transparent citations and direct links to source documents for all extracted information.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Research Collections & Collaboration
ConsensusConsensus
Research Collections enables users to organize discovered papers into custom folders for ongoing research projects, literature reviews, or collaborative team efforts. Users can create hierarchical folder structures, add personal notes and annotations to saved papers, tag papers with custom labels, and share collections with collaborators. The collaboration features support real-time teamwork on literature reviews, with team members able to add papers, comment on findings, and discuss research within the platform. Collections sync across devices, and users can export entire collections to reference management tools like Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote in standard citation formats. The system also provides collection-level analytics showing research trends, publication dates, and consensus patterns across saved papers. Organize, annotate, and collaborate on research projects with team members while maintaining seamless integration with existing reference management workflows
✓ Organize, annotate, and collaborate on research projects with team members while maintaining seamless integration with existing reference management workflows
Elicit
Elicit supports flexible research workflows that adapt to different research methodologies and project requirements. Users can create custom extraction templates with specific columns tailored to their research questions, save and reuse search strategies across projects, and organize papers into collections for different aspects of their research. The platform supports iterative refinement of searches and extractions, allowing researchers to progressively narrow focus or expand scope as their understanding develops. Collaboration features enable research teams to share workflows and build on each other's work. Adapts to diverse research needs from quick literature scans to comprehensive systematic reviews requiring PRISMA-compliant documentation.
✓ Adapts to diverse research needs from quick literature scans to comprehensive systematic reviews requiring PRISMA-compliant documentation
Both Consensus and Elicit offer Research Collections & Collaboration. Consensus's approach focuses on research collections enables users to organize discovered papers into custom folders for ongoing research projects, literature reviews, or collaborative team efforts., while Elicit emphasizes elicit supports flexible research workflows that adapt to different research methodologies and project requirements.. Choose based on which implementation better fits your workflow.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Consensus
Strengths
- ✓Consensus Search: Consensus Search revolutionizes academic research by enabling users to ask natural language questions and receive synthesized, evidence-based answers...
- ✓Study Insights & Summaries: Study Insights provides AI-generated summaries of research papers that extract and highlight the most critical information without requiring users to...
- ✓Consensus Meter: The Consensus Meter is Consensus's signature feature that visually represents the level of scientific agreement on any research question. When users s...
- ✓Citation Network & Research Lineage: The Citation Network feature maps the intellectual lineage of research by visualizing how papers cite and build upon each other over time. Users can e...
- ✓Research Collections & Collaboration: Research Collections enables users to organize discovered papers into custom folders for ongoing research projects, literature reviews, or collaborati...
Weaknesses
- ✗AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
- ✗Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
- ✗Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.
Elicit
Strengths
- ✓Semantic Paper Search: Elicit's semantic search capability goes beyond keyword matching to understand the conceptual meaning behind research questions. When users enter a qu...
- ✓Automated Data Extraction: Elicit's data extraction engine automatically reads through research papers and pulls out structured information based on user-defined columns. Resear...
- ✓Research Synthesis & Summarization: Beyond individual paper analysis, Elicit synthesizes findings across multiple papers to identify patterns, consensus views, and contradictions in the...
- ✓Citation & Source Verification: Elicit maintains rigorous academic standards by providing transparent citations and direct links to source documents for all extracted information. Ev...
- ✓Custom Research Workflows: Elicit supports flexible research workflows that adapt to different research methodologies and project requirements. Users can create custom extractio...
Weaknesses
- ✗AI-generated content requires human review to ensure accuracy and brand voice consistency.
- ✗Initial setup and integration may require technical resources or onboarding support.
- ✗Feature depth means users may not utilize all capabilities, potentially reducing ROI for simpler use cases.
Use Case Fit
AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting
Consensus
Approach: Consensus automates the entire outbound prospecting workflow using AI. The platform identifies ideal customer profiles, enriches contact data from multiple sources, and generates personalized email sequences at scale. Sales teams can set targeting criteria and let the AI handle research, outreach, and follow-ups.
Outcome: 70% time savings on prospecting activities, 3x increase in qualified meetings booked, 50% improvement in email response rates through AI personalization.
Elicit
Approach: Elicit automates the entire outbound prospecting workflow using AI. The platform identifies ideal customer profiles, enriches contact data from multiple sources, and generates personalized email sequences at scale. Sales teams can set targeting criteria and let the AI handle research, outreach, and follow-ups.
Outcome: 70% time savings on prospecting activities, 3x increase in qualified meetings booked, 50% improvement in email response rates through AI personalization.
Recommendation: Both Consensus and Elicit support this use case effectively. Compare their approaches and choose based on which aligns better with your existing processes.
Lead Qualification and Scoring
Consensus
Approach: Consensus uses AI to automatically qualify and score leads based on firmographic data, behavioral signals, and engagement patterns. The system continuously learns from conversion data to improve scoring accuracy and prioritize the highest-value opportunities.
Outcome: 45% increase in lead-to-opportunity conversion, 60% reduction in time spent on unqualified leads, 2x improvement in sales team productivity.
Elicit
Approach: Elicit uses AI to automatically qualify and score leads based on firmographic data, behavioral signals, and engagement patterns. The system continuously learns from conversion data to improve scoring accuracy and prioritize the highest-value opportunities.
Outcome: 45% increase in lead-to-opportunity conversion, 60% reduction in time spent on unqualified leads, 2x improvement in sales team productivity.
Recommendation: Both Consensus and Elicit support this use case effectively. Compare their approaches and choose based on which aligns better with your existing processes.
Industry-Specific Fit
| Industry | Consensus | Elicit | Better Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Academic Research | Consensus serves as an indispensable tool for academic researchers conducting literature reviews, writing grant proposals, and staying current with developments in their fields. The platform dramatically accelerates the traditionally time-consuming process of searching, reading, and synthesizing research papers. Researchers can quickly identify the current state of knowledge on any topic, find gaps in existing research, and discover foundational papers they may have missed. The consensus visualization helps researchers understand where scientific agreement exists and where questions remain open, informing research directions and hypothesis development. | Elicit serves as an essential tool for academic researchers across all disciplines who need to conduct literature reviews, prepare grant proposals, or stay current with developments in their fields. PhD students use Elicit to efficiently survey existing literature for dissertation research, identifying gaps their work can address. Faculty researchers leverage the platform to prepare comprehensive review articles and ensure their work builds appropriately on prior findings. The tool is particularly valuable in fast-moving fields where the volume of new publications makes manual tracking impractical. | Tie |
| Healthcare & Medicine | Healthcare professionals use Consensus to access evidence-based information for clinical decision-making, patient education, and staying current with medical research. Physicians can quickly find research on treatment efficacy, drug interactions, and diagnostic approaches. The platform's ability to synthesize findings across multiple studies is particularly valuable in medicine where individual studies may have conflicting results. Healthcare organizations use Consensus to support evidence-based practice guidelines and quality improvement initiatives. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Pharmaceutical & Biotech | Pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies leverage Consensus for drug discovery research, competitive intelligence, and regulatory submissions. Research teams use the platform to survey existing literature on drug targets, identify potential side effects reported in research, and understand the competitive landscape of therapeutic areas. The citation network features help trace the development of scientific understanding around specific mechanisms and compounds. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Higher Education | Universities and colleges use Consensus to support student research, enhance information literacy instruction, and provide faculty with efficient research tools. Students benefit from the platform's ability to quickly find and synthesize research for papers and projects. Librarians use Consensus to teach evidence evaluation skills. The platform's emphasis on peer-reviewed sources and citation transparency aligns with academic integrity standards. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Journalism & Media | Journalists and media organizations use Consensus to fact-check claims, find expert sources, and ensure accuracy in science and health reporting. The fact-checking features enable quick verification of statements against research evidence. Reporters can use the platform to understand scientific consensus on contested topics and avoid false balance in coverage. Media organizations integrate Consensus into editorial workflows for accuracy review. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Policy & Government | Government agencies and policy organizations use Consensus to inform evidence-based policy development and evaluate the research basis for proposed regulations. Policy analysts can quickly survey research on policy-relevant topics, understand the strength of evidence, and identify areas where more research is needed. The platform's consensus visualization helps communicate the state of scientific knowledge to decision-makers and stakeholders. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Legal & Compliance | Legal professionals use Consensus to find research evidence for litigation, regulatory compliance, and expert witness preparation. Attorneys can quickly identify relevant research on topics ranging from product safety to environmental impacts. The platform's citation tracking helps establish the credibility and influence of specific studies. Compliance teams use Consensus to stay current with research relevant to regulatory requirements. | Not specified | Consensus |
| Corporate Research & Development | R&D teams across industries use Consensus to survey existing research, identify innovation opportunities, and avoid duplicating existing work. The platform accelerates the literature review phase of research projects and helps teams understand the current state of knowledge in their domains. Product development teams use Consensus to find research supporting product claims and identify potential issues early in development cycles. | Not specified | Consensus |
Our Verdict
Consensus and Elicit are both strong AI Research solutions. Consensus excels at consensus search. Both support key use cases like ai sdr: automated outbound prospecting, but with different approaches. Choose based on which specific features and approach best fit your workflow and requirements.
Choose Consensus if you:
- ✓You need consensus search capabilities
- ✓You need study insights & summaries capabilities
- ✓You operate in Academic Research
- ✓AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting is your primary use case
Choose Elicit if you:
- ✓You operate in Academic Research
- ✓AI SDR: Automated Outbound Prospecting is your primary use case
- ✓You prefer Elicit's approach to ai research
Need Help Choosing?
Get expert guidance on selecting between Consensus and Elicit for your specific use case.
Find a Strategy PartnerFrequently Asked Questions
Sources & Evidence
AI-powered consensus extraction from peer-reviewed research with citation-backed answers
Source: Consensus uniquely analyzes over 200 million peer-reviewed papers to identify agreement across studies and extract key findings with direct citations. The platform's proprietary Consensus Meter visualizes research agreement levels, showing users at a glance whether scientific consensus supports, opposes, or is mixed on any given topic. Unlike Google Scholar or PubMed which return ranked results requiring manual synthesis, Consensus automatically reads papers, extracts conclusions, and synthesizes findings across multiple studies—transforming hours of literature review into seconds of AI-powered analysis while maintaining full citation transparency.
Automated paper analysis with AI-powered extraction of key findings, methodologies, sample sizes, and structured data without manual reading
Source: Elicit uses large language models to automatically extract structured information from research papers, allowing users to analyze hundreds of papers in the time it would take to manually read a few. Unlike traditional academic search engines that only return paper titles and abstracts, Elicit reads full-text PDFs and extracts specific data points like study populations, intervention details, outcome measures, and statistical results. This capability has been validated by researchers conducting systematic reviews who report 10x or greater efficiency improvements in their literature review workflows.